The perceived lack of success of public agricultural extension systems in many countries has resulted in new approaches being tried in reorganizing extension services. In some countries, such as India and China, public extension systems have been decentralized to the district/county level and these public extension systems are now pursuing a more market-driven approach. In other countries, different models have been tried, involving both private-sector firms and civil society organizations (CSOs), in an attempt to find more effective approaches of providing basic extension services. Also, in some countries, there have been attempts to shift more of the cost of extension services to the farmers themselves, with limited success. This paper provides a framework for analyzing the success or failure of different approaches within the agricultural development process in providing particular extension services to different categories of farmers.
Every country has developed, formulated, and decreed national policies related to rural advisory services. Find some examples here. If you are looking for a national policy from a specific country, please use the search function, selecting the category “National policies” and the tag for the country.
Tuesday, 08 May 2018 15:32
Global Review of Good Agricultural Extension and Advisory Service Practices
Written by Ingrid OliveiraDownload here3085 times downloaded
Published in
Reviews and Assessments
Latest from Ingrid Oliveira
- Sustainable Undernutrition Reduction in Ethiopia: Training manual for Health and Agriculture Development Armies
- What Every Extension Worker Should Know - Core Competency Handbook
- Sustainable Nutrition Manual Part 3: Healthy Designs
- Sustainable Nutrition Manual Part 2: Healthy Environments
- Sustainable Nutrition Manual Part 1: Healthy Humans